CONSPIRACY THEORIES - Part One
Before I begin writing this post I better just establish a benchmark: I personally believe that David Icke, to use a popular idiom, is several sandwiches short of a picnic. I even wonder from time to time if Stuart Wilde hasn't partaken of one too many hallucinogenic drugs when he trips off on some of his stories (and I like him). As for most of the conspiracy theories, I enjoy them as light entertainment as much as the next person but I don't lose sight of the fact they are rarely rooted in fact. In other words I don't believe I am easily taken in.There are a couple of conspiracy theories doing the rounds now though that I believe deserve greater scrutiny. They need to be looked at through the lens of logic and also with an eye to symbolism. Let's start with the death of Princess Diana.
DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES.
In the months before her death Diana was pictured walking through a minefield, literally dodging the actual detonation of something that could erase her from public life. Symbolically then the parallels are clear - she was treading a dangerous path and she knew it.....
Diana may not have had a Mensa level IQ but this woman was very smart. So where one wonders was her brain in 1996/7? Did she enjoy stirring up dark forces with her Mars/Pluto conjunction? I ask this because logic dictates that if the Mother of the future King of England (in fact the two future Kings, because she produced an heir and and a spare) had sought advice - via Burrell - from a Clergyman about the possibility of her marrying a Muslim Doctor, Hasnat Khan, the situation wasn't just explosive, it was potentially catastrophic.
Then just when the Universe intervened to let her off the hook and out of the minefield - when Hasnat decided he couldn't continue with the relationship - what did she do? Did she go off and find some other suitable mate or walker to tide her over until her broken heart had mended? No, she perversely (Moon in Aquarius) decided to accept the invitation of Mr al-Fayed to join him and his playboy son Dodi for a summer break. It's a record of fact that she even tipped off the press to catch her draped all over Dodi, just happening to kiss him at a perfect angle for paparazzi lenses to capture.
Remember too if you will that in the late 1990's the establishment (Cap) had only just got over the slightly anarchist (UR) era and shocks from the Fergie toe-sucking saga. Now the shockwaves (UR) were starting to reverberate into politics (AQ) with Tony Blair's surprise rise to leadership and the demise of the long term power of the Conservatives. The 'old school' were losing control, a revolution was underway (UR in AQ). Additionally, if you are not British or are below an age to realise the significance of Diana's actions to those in halls of power, let me fill you in..... If Bill Clinton walked into a press conference Hillary was giving this week with a cigar in one hand, and his other hand on a gorgeous, youthful Democratic party intern's bum, whilst wearing a T-shirt saying 'Barack for President' you have an idea of the level of shockwaves Diana's actions caused to the British Establishment. Had she lost her mind? Was she trying to taunt Prince Charles and anyone she considered to be 'Westminster'? Fayed was already enemy numero uno to many of them in the late '90s as Mr al-Fayed himself openly admits (Born Mohamed Fayed he added the aristocratic prefix "al" to his name at the age of 45). With links to known arms dealers, he was deemed as far too controversial and new-money.
So why would anyone want to wipe out such a beautiful woman just because she was dabbling with an allegedly dodgy shop owners son and having such a public power struggle with a few old courtiers and grey suits? Well possibly because if Diana were to go on to have a half-muslim child (by Dodi or Hasnat) her son's, William and Harry, would then have a Muslim step brother or sister. This would cause implications to the future of the Monarchy because when a King or Queen is crowned in England, part of their Oath, as it stands at present, is to become Supreme Governor of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith. Whilst you and I realise we can and should live in a free society that embraces multiculturalism and interfaith marriages most of the 'Old School' still won't countenance it (or they wouldn't in 1997).
To this strata of snobbish elite - the 'Courtiers' who are often aristocratic men and women whose family ancestry formed the backbone of British Society throughout history - change is anathema. They would have been mortified. Were they going to be held to ransom and forced to change the Constitution by this woman who appeared to be suffering the equivalent of a Britney Spears type public meltdown as a result of her failed relationship with Hasnat? A woman who many of them dismissed as an airheaded, clothes horse. Were they heck! This time one can only deduce Diana had stepped squarely on a detonator.
So could the British Government have orchestrated the assassination because Diana, Princess of Wales, had become a loose canon? They would certainly have sworn allegiance to the Monarch and Country and be desirous of protecting both against any perceived threat and there can surely be little doubt that (to many) getting at Mohamed al-Fayed at the same time would be a bonus. However they can stand up in Court and say with all honesty that there was no government conspiracy. Why? Because.. (I quote) 'although the Security Service Act 1989 places the Security Service under the authority of the Secretary of State - in practice the Home Secretary - the Service operates independently of government'.
So was Diana killed off? Who knows? In August 1997 when rumours swirled of an impending announcement that would shock everyone, logic dictates that someone could have decided to act. Toxicology reports from driver Henri Paul do seem to support some kind of machinations as does the symbolic location of Diana's death i.e., underground. If my blog suddenly goes down or I disappear, you'll probably find me in the Tower but after 10+ years of watching this play out I personally have to exert my freedom to express an opinion and concur with the theorists and say that I do smell a rat. In the words of our amazing Queen, for whom incidentally I have the utmost respect " There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge. Do you understand?"
Jesus, that's very scary isn't it.
In part two of my posts on conspiracy theories I will be assessing the McCann abduction. I have already written it but I will post it separately.












<



